"Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized.

  In the first, it is ridiculed,
      in the second it is opposed,
           and in the third it is regarded as self-evident."
              (philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer)

Selected Issues in Educational Computing

This Issues page tracks fundamental issues that have special relevance to the integration of information technology and education. At the same time, this reading is addressing how to teach students to respond and address any ethical questions, not just digital literacy topics, incorporating the higher thinking skill of evaluation. What is the truth? What is right? What is wrong? What is best and worst? What criteria are useful in reaching these judgments? Where possible this page provides links to search terms, web pages and offline publications that offer evidence and claims for a position on a particular issue. The effectiveness of your claims depend heavily on the clarity of your criteria.

Criteria & Evaluation Thinking

Criteria are standards, rules, or tests on which a judgment or decision can be based. 

Carefully examine each of your criteria that you create when considering the issues discussed below to see if they meet this definition.

 It is not the goal of this web page to claim to present the truth of any of these issues or to even take a position. That is for you to determine based on your further study of the issue. This web page exists out of a positive perspective that if sufficient time is allowed along with an open mind and sufficient interaction on the topic, the truth will emerge. As the number of continuing wars around the world indicates, this is not easy. That is, not only does truth pass through stages of growth, but passing through these stages is critical to its development and its recognition. To participate in the conflict and debate about the truth strengthens, not weakens, its development. Failure to participate in the dialog also fails the test of citizenship in a democracy. Failure to keep an open mind prevents change and innovation, which are essential to a more stable resolution of the problem.

 You will need to use the key words within the headings of the table of contents below to do further searching for the latest developments on these topics beyond the links provided below. Further, given the rapid change in web pages on the Internet, many of these links will no longer be working. Use your thinking skills to develop an evaluation of these issues. Use the evaluation essay template to develop an approach to writing evaluation responses. This also means that the discussion and judgment must be built on or preceded by a discussion of the criteria that will be accepted as the basis for further thought. This thought must present your researched evidence, your personal reasoning and finally your conclusions and decision.

Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Discussion

It is important for educators to continually experiment with models of different online and offline systems of interaction to better enable teachers and learners to confront and work through persistent beliefs and ideas. There are two basic models for dialog: asynchronous and synchronous. Asynchronous means that participants to the discussion and debate can do so at different times and from different places. That is they can add to the written or spoken trail of commentary whenever it is convenient. Synchronous communication means that all participants have to be active at the same time. For example, a face-to-face conversation means that all must be not only talking at the same time but be in the same space. Interactive chat means that all must be online at the same time, but would not be in the same geographic space. For each topic below, a boldfaced question or comment is presented to facilitate your evaluation of the issue. Read through this web page to be understand the issue posed by each and then pick one for your focus question. Feel free to add to the comments in the asynchronous "SUP room" for each of the topics. Some of these threads of dialog go back over several years; some have barely touched by participants.

For each question in boldface below, there is an available asynchronous form of communication, an SUP Discussion Room to which you are asked to respond and to help develop. This participation will give greater depth to your reflection on this topic. This is also a part of your Question Ambassador service to yourself and to this class which makes up 10% of your course grade. As you have learned, this wonderweb technology is similar to the nature of email conferences such as newsgroups and LISTSERVs.

For some topics, a free synchronous or live text chat system called Parachat that is free has been provided. Anyone can insert this feature into their own web pages. Of course to use it, a group of people must agree ahead of time to enter the chat room at the same time. For other topics, other forms of live chat are encouraged which require other applications or other web pages. This includes Instant Messenger services, IRC (Internet Relay Chat) and the live chat rooms within course management systems such as WebCT and Centra. The results of online Chat typing can easily be copied from the Chat window and pasted into a word processor for later review and documentation. It could also be used as essay or story starter for further writing. WebCT also provides Wimba, a live online voice chat system. They all are different formats for sharing email or short messages over some period of time.  Such synchronous effort will be left to the reader's own initiatives.

Is asynchronous better than synchronous? Each has advantages and disadvantages. For the purposes of this course, the course SUP system provides two important differences. Only the SUP system provides threaded continuity over very long periods of time that go beyond a single semester. Only the SUP system provides unified printing of all the messages in the thread from one web page. There are commercial discussion group software products which work similar to the Wonderweb's SUP system.

Evaluation Thinking

Does anybody really think like this, really use evaluation thinking in real life? That is also a good question to contemplate. Under what circumstances does such thinking occur? How frequently do such situations arise? Who must think like this? What is there about world culture that suggests that we need more of it?

 

Selected Topics

  1. Equity: Funding (Grantsmanship) for Technology (Both)
  2. Techno-Utopians vs. neo-Luddites   (Both)
  3. Internet Access and the digital divide: Local Call, Wiring, Hosting
  4. School Acceptable Use Policies
  5. Internet Regulation: Blocking and Filtering; Controlling Access vs. Censorship (Both)
  6. Privacy
  7. Security
  8. Copyright
  9. Significant Difference and Technology
  10. Planning for Technology
  11. Physical Health
  12. Social Health (Both)
  13. Diversity
  14. Cyborg: Body-Technology Integration
  15. Spectrum Allocation: Consumer Opportunity or Information Highway Robbery
  16. Synthetic Biology

     

Using online search tools, there are many other topics of educational import needing evaluation that one could look up and evaluate which are not explored further on this page: impact of commercialization on the education of teachers and children (e.g., Channel One; ZapMe!); digital currency; telecomputing; computer addiction; information overload; isolation vs. communal participation; crime (hackers vs. crackers); information warfare; online sale of human ova and sperm; local tax base in a global economy; error-free computer programs; defective software; information and socio-economic inequalities; artificial life forms; artificial intelligence; potential for online democracy vs. totalitarianism; the value of oral vs. written vs. linking culture.

If you would like to further develop the educational relevance of one of these latter items or one not mentioned and have it included on this list, please submit a written proposal on paper or via email with related web sites or other source material along with your potential evaluation question.

Sub-Sections

Equity: Funding (Grantsmanship) for Technology

  • Is funding for new technology in education adequate? What criteria should be used to determine what is adequate? That is, what does "adequate" mean in this context?
  • There are also related issues that can be worked in. If funding is not adequate, what actions should a school building or school district take to provide more adequate resources? Can school district funding alone close the gap between the haves and have nots in technology resources?
    Optional: As part of responding to this question you can extend your answer to the question chosen by also rating or judging the quality of resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

    Techno-Utopians vs. neo-Luddites

    Some argue that technology will save the world while others predict that technology is leading to catastrophe. Who is right? What criteria should be used to determine what is "right perspective"?

    Some in our culture appear to argue that cyberspace and new technologies have an inherent goodness to them and others claim that they bring an inherent threat to the existing strengths of schools and communities. Others who label themselves "technorealists" seek a middle ground.

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).
     
    Discussion Options
    Asynchronous Synchronous
  • SUP Discussion Room for the "technorealism" topic.
    Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
  • Live Online Chat on this topic.
  • This is free if we have a tolerance for commercials. Let me know what you think of this chat format. ParaChat Help is available.

    Internet Access and the Digital Divide

    Should everyone have free access to the Internet in the same way that roads and libraries are free? What criteria should be used to determine what is "important"? That is, what does important mean in this context?
    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).
      Discussion Options
      Asynchronous Synchronous
    • SUP Discussion Room for the "internet access" topic
      Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
    • Explore IM, IRC, WebCT chat; or Wimba voice chat.
    • Preparing Schools for Internet Access

      • NetDay96, a national and state by state organization focused on wiring schools for Internet access. Many schools in our region have used the resources of this organization to wire up their schools. "NetDay is a grass-roots volunteer effort to wire schools so they can network their computers and connect them to the Internet. Labor and materials come from volunteers and support from companies, unions, parents, teachers, students, and school employees."

      Western North Carolina Local Call Access

      Building and Obtaining home and classroom Internet Access is an ongoing problem for schools at this time, especially in rural regions. The options available for our rural area are also useful for a wide range of school systems:

      Access to Other Internet Service Providers

      Creative Alternative Ideas for Access

    School Acceptable Use Policies

    Does an AUP impose an unacceptable level of censorship on teaching and learning?  What criteria should be used to determine what is "best"? That is, how will we know they are best in this context?

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

    Discussion Options
    Asynchronous Synchronous
  • SUP Discussion Room for the "acceptable use"  topic
    Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
  • Explore IM, IRC, WebCT chat; or Wimba voice chat.
  • Internet Regulation: Blocking and Filtering;
    Controlling Access vs. Censorship

    Currently, the Internet culture is managed so that schools and families must bear the cost and burden of screening out offensive material instead of offensive material becoming available only by subscription and therefore invisible unless specific permission is given. Protection vs. Freedom? Who is right? What criteria should be used to determine what is "right"? That is, what does right mean in this context?
     
    Discussion Options
    Asynchronous Synchronous
  • SUP Discussion Room for this "Internet Regulation" topic.

  • Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
  • Live Online Chat on this topic.
  • This is free if we have a tolerance for commercials. Let me know what you think of this chat format. ParaChat Help is available.
    • Parents' Guide to the Internet covers not only basic Internet use, but emphasizes child and family safety and highlights interesting sites for children to visit.
    • Technology Inventory. This document provides an inventory of technologies that support parents' ability to choose content appropriate for their children, or address online personal safety issues affecting children. It presents an overview of the "empowerment tools" design space, discusses gaps where additional work may be needed, and includes as appendices a) information on the Platform for Internet Content Selection; b) a catalog of available technologies; c) a list of Internet content for children and parents; d) a list of online tools to find and prevent missing children; and e) a description of tools to protect children's online privacy. 66 pages, includes annotated bibliography.
    • ALA's (American Library Associations) opposition to CIPA (Children's Internet Protection Act) for public libraries and Federal Court rulings
    • Internet Online Summit: Focus On Children
    • Internet Safety Concerns by McREL.
    • Resources for Internet Parents
    • Making the Internet Child Safe, product and project. There are other similar software products.
    • The Netly News Critiques Blocking and Censorship.
    • The FAQs on Filtering from the organization of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
    • Censorship vs. Civil Rights
    • Specific Filtering Products - Yahoo's List
    • What should parents and educators think about filtering or censoring? 

      Without too much search engine time you will find much that is offensive to many on the Internet. 1. Violent and criminal behavior can be found with these search terms: warez; Terrorist's Handbook; Anarchist's Cookbook or Jolly Roger sites; drugs and words meaning drug activity. There are also activities that are illegal for certain age levels in regards to guns, cigarettes, beer, alcohol and drugs and gambling; 2.  Tastes considered socially obscene by some are searchable simply by entering:  www.(sexual term or innuendo).com; 3. Hate sites can be found by using their special vocabulary for hate with more than 1400 racist, anti-Semitic and other themes tracked by the Wiesenthal Center. Other forms of activity such as violent video games that do not require (but can use) the Internet like Duke Nukem could require direct adult intervention. 4. Live interaction with people who may be able to talk students into acts not in their best interest is possible.

      Others, including the ALA, counter that filtering technology does not discriminate well and in fact cannot in principle. Further, filtering technology errs on the side of keeping information unavailable and thereby keeps students and citizens from a such significant body of legally acceptable material that filtering is a violation of First Amendment rights to free speech. Further, there is information that is being filtered that is available in books in our library system. Should students be able to search for "breast cancer" and have appropriate articles come up instead of being eliminated because of the common biological term "breast"? Does hiding knowledge of the real world from children make them safer and more capable? Why should the expense of filtering and the network delays caused by filtering fall on those least able to afford them, public schools and public libraries, instead of requiring those providing pornography and other socially unacceptable material to totally hide their displays (images, sounds and text, etc.) behind passwords? What percent of the cost of filtering is covered by the federal legislation? What instructional resources and activities could not be purchased because schools and public libraries must pay for the filtering?

    Privacy

    Should users be able to have private communication and confidential information within Internet space?  What criteria should be used to determine this?
      Discussion Options
      Asynchronous Synchronous
    • SUP Discussion Room for the "Internet privacy" topic
      Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
    • Explore IM, IRC, WebCT chat; or Wimba voice chat.
    • "The danger of the Internet now is the illusion of anonymity that's completely false. People think they're invisible." Janlori Goldman at CDT. (Leslie Miller, "On the Internet, there is virtually no privacy," USA Today, May 30, 1996, 6D.)
       

    • Web Sites
    • Related Readings:
      • Quittner, Joshua (August 25, 1997). Invasion of Privacy. Time Magazine.
      • Lane, Carole (1997). Naked in Cyberspace: How to Find Personal Information Online. Independent Publication Group. ISBN: 091096517X
      • ----- (1996). Your Personal Netspy : How You Can Access the Facts and Cover Your Tracks Using the Internet and Online Services, Wolff New Media. ISBN: 0679770291
    • Quick Technique:
      • Check the Preferences sections of Netscape and Internet Explorer and cancel or set warning features for the Cookie option which allows other sites to track your web page moves.

    Security for Your Computer Data

    What is the best way to keep your data and your computer processes safe? What criteria should be used to determine what is best? That is, what does "best" mean in this context?

    This topic is closely related to the topic of privacy. The topic of security raises issues of how to protect your data and your time while the topic of privacy considers the issues of how much security your data should be allowed to have. You might reach for metaphors such as monoculture and immune system which are about the larger behavior of systems and which suggest known conceptual solutions.

     You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

     

     

    • Hacker modifies web page of U.S. Army - then caught.
    • Security for your data vs. Security for criminals
    • Books addressing Security and Encryption
    • Internet Hoaxes - though not destructive of our computers, they are destructive of our time and network performance.
    • IBM Virus and Hoax Alert - Anti-Virus Online
    • Yahoo's Index to Virus and Hoax Alert Sites
    • Anti-Virus Software (Statewide distribution)
    • COMMAND SOFTWARE ANTI-VIRUS Prepared by
      John L. Cheney, Networking Analyst, Distributed Computing Services 

      Overview

      The Office of Information Technology Services (ITS) of North Carolina provides anti-virus
      products from Command Software through a statewide site license
      contract. They are available at no cost to public agencies and
      institutions in North Carolina. These include public schools, community
      colleges, universities within the UNC System, local governments (and
      subsidiaries like libraries, etc.) and state government. The contract
      also allows agency personnel to install CSAV software on personal
      computers at their homes.

      Command also maintains an FTP site. ITS also maintains an FTP site
      which serves as a backup source for the Command Software anti-virus
      software from which agencies should download the required software.

      Command Software List Services

      All users of Command Anti-virus Software should join one or all of the
      CSAV Lists. This will allow you to get notices of virus alerts, as well
      as version and def-files update notifications as soon as they are
      available. Go to the following URL to join:

      http://www.commandcom.com/html/lists.html

      If you need information about the Command Software Contract or access
      instructions, contact John L. Cheney (919-981-5166) or
      john.cheney@ncmail.net.

      Disclaimer   While ITS also provides secondary access to the software
      and a site from which to download it, Command Software is responsible
      for the performance of and primary access to the anti-virus products.
      Any installation or operational problems that occur should be reported
      directly to Command Technical Support using one or both of the methods
      set forth in the Technical Support section below.

      Benny E. Hendrix, Director and
      Network Security Officer Infrastructure Technologies
      NC Dept. of Public Instruction
      Ed. Bldg. Rm. 320
      301 N. Wilmington St.
      Raleigh, NC  27601

      919-807-3190 Office
      919-807-3415 Voice Mail
      919-807-3421 Fax
      email: bhendrix@dpi.state.nc.us
       

      Security Software Companies (home and office computer protection)

      The products of the software companies listed here have not been evaluated or rated. If you are actually selecting software for your needs, look for, read and study the reviews of the software titles.

        Security Hole Hunters

      Security hole programs check for known areas of weakness, areas overlooked by the initial programmers of your operating systems and applications. If these holes are not plugged, someone could have unauthorized access to control your computer and thereby damage or steal your computer's files remotely.
       
    • Shields Up! Use this web site to probe your home or office computer to see if it is adequately protected from hackers. Other freeware tests are available at this site.
    • Network Ice
    • ZoneLabs
      • Code Hunters

      Code hunter virus programs look for specific strings of characters that are know to exist in programs that do bad things to your computer.
       
    • McAfee.com
    • Symantec
    • Security Systems supplier of software for protecting office computers from attack over the Internet.
    • Network Associates supplier of software for protecting office computers from attack over the Internet.
      • Behavior Hunters

      In contrast to code hunter software that looks for specific strings of characters that are know to cause problems, behavior hunter protection software looks for computer program activities that are suspicious. It looks for any code in an email message or attachment that can run as an independent program. To test the safety of any programs that it finds, it sets up a secure or quarantined place in computer memory where these programs can be run or executed without spilling over into other areas of computer operation. If a program that is being tested attempts to do something that is unauthorized such as replicating itself, copying files and data and transmitting it a remote place on the Internet or erasing your hard drive, the program will be blocked and the computer owner warned of its presence and given some suggested solutions.
       
    • Finjan
    • Aladdin Knowledge Systems
    • Trend Micro

    Copyright

    What is the right way to balance the right to earn a living and with the right to see, teach and learn, in the information age? What criteria should be used to determine what is "the right way"? That is, what does the right way mean in this context?

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

     

    The Debate over the Significant Difference

    Is computer technology guilty of not providing any significant positive differences to the educational community and to our culture? What criteria should be used to determine what "guilty" means? That is, what does the guilty mean in this context?

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

     
    • McREL's Impact of Technology
    • Professor Murfin's Summary of Larry Cuban's book, Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920.
    • Related Readings:

      Oppenheimer, Todd (1997, July). The Computer Delusion. The Atlantic Monthly, 45-48, 50-56, 61-62. [Educational productivity]
      Uchitelle, Louis (1996, December 6). What Has the Computer Done for Us Lately? New York Times, 1, 4. [Economic productivity]

    Planning for Technology

    Choose 2 or 3 long range technology planning issues and indicate which is most important?  This question has a higher level of difficulty because the first part comes in two subsections. First, one must determine 2 or 3 long range technology planning issues and list them. Second, one must list the criteria by which one will select among the listed choices. What criteria should be used to determine what is "most important"? That is, what does the most important mean in this context?

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

    Physical Health - Ergonomics

    Choose 3 computer related health problems. Which of these 3 computer-related health problems is the most important to address?

    This question has a higher level of difficulty because this first part comes in two subsections. First, one must determine 2 or 3 long range computer related health problems and list them. Second, one must list the criteria by which one will select among the listed choices. What criteria should be used to determine what is "most important"? That is, what does the most important mean in this context?

    First it is useful to study what physical health issues are created by computer-related technologies. You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).


    Social Health

    What are the most important "good manners" and proper social behavior around computers and computer networks that educators should enforce? What criteria should be used to determine what is "most important"? That is, what does the most important mean in this context?

    You may also consider it a part of responding to this question to rate or judge the quality other resources that you find for this topic, providing a citation for them whether they are online (on a hard drive) or off-line (on a shelf).

    Discussion Options
    Asynchronous Synchronous
  • SUP Discussion Room for the "netiquette" topic.

  • Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
  • Live Online Chat on this topic.
  • This is free if we have a tolerance for commercials. Let me know what you think of this chat format. ParaChat Help is available.
     

    Diversity

      Is "telecomputer technology" a good way to strengthen our acceptance of diversity and our reduction of stereotypes towards others? What criteria should be used to determine what is "a good way"? That is, what does good way mean in this context?

      The term telecomputer refers to the telephone like or telecommunications capacity of computers, from voice over the Internet to email, newsgroups, listservs, web servers, webcams, videoconferencing and more. As the pace of the information age combined with the global reach of the Internet bring ever more different groups of people into increasing contact, all of us must increasingly deal with the issue of diversity. This diversity extends across wide ranges of culture, language, time-zones, socio-economic status, race, gender and more.
       
      Discussion Options
      Asynchronous Synchronous
    • SUP Discussion Room for the "diversity" topic Commercial-free with stored searchable threading. Please add to the discussion.
    • Explore IM, IRC, WebCT chat; or Wimba voice chat.

  • The Turing Game
  • Cyborg: Body-Technology Integration

    Is experimentation with inserting computer-type devices into the human body a good idea? What criteria should be used to determine if this is "a good idea"? That is, what does good idea mean in this context? Curriculum and technology integration is a long-standing concern and goal of state educational systems. Transplant of body parts including external control of heart replacements have been carried out and explored for many years. Electronic sensors placed inside the body take this concept to an entirely new level of body-technology integration.

    Some search term ideas for further study are: transponder implant; cyborg; electronic medicine; robots; robotics; Kevin Warwick; prosthesis; prosthetic devices; heart transplants; transplants; Jarvik heart; Debakey heart.

    Spectrum Allocation: Consumer Opportunity or Information Highway Robbery

    Is it best to yield to the request by certain major telephone companies for educational institutions to give up the ITFS Spectrum to better serve the larger consumer market? What criteria should be used to determine if this is "the best thing to do"? That is, what does best mean in this context? Imagine that educational systems are holding acreage on which it is believed that very significant quantities of gold have been discovered. Imagine further that the largest most well-heeled corporations in the world, in this case selected telephone companies, are making a case to the Federal government that it should be taken away and given to them because of great consumer need in this area.

    The acreage to which I am referring is the seemingly esoteric topic of electromagnetic spectrum used for telecommunications. The case is being made to the FCC and to legislators that educators are making such inadequate use of this wealth that it should be handed over. Telephone and other giant companies do not have enough of this spectrum to meet the demands for growth in the wireless computer and data markets in the years ahead. They estimate the market is worth billions. They cannot get the military to give up any of their spectrum. The FCC allocated portions of the spectrum to educational systems over thirty years ago for the purpose of ITFS (Instructional Television Fixed Service). Schools set up "fixed wireless" networks that use the airwaves to deliver programming back when that meant building a TV studio and video broadcast facilities. But spectrum can be used to deliver any kind of signal. That includes signal for wireless computer networks.

    Imagine instead renting this space to these corporations and having a real and very long term revenue stream for education that could make state lottery money for education seems trivial. Imagine this money going to work for rural western North Carolina to provide the fiber bandwidth for which we are desperately competing. Imagine having the wealth to put a handheld computer in the hands of every student in WNC and the rest of North America, a computer that is connected to the very wireless networks that the corporations want to build.

    It seems to me that education would appear to have a number of very interesting options. Education could argue that we:

    1. Follow the lead of other ITFS holders and use ITFS spectrum to build our own local wireless data networks. A next step might be to create a co-op of state agencies that gets external financing to build their own national wireless data network. This is not so far-fetched. Quoting the AASA filing, "ITFS also helps bridge another form of "digital divide." Nearly two-thirds of all public school districts are designated as rural and small districts. Rural school districts seek to overcome the digital divide by finding new ways to gain Internet access. Fiber deployment is not realistic for cost reasons. ITFS offers the ability to serve rural areas through wireless Internet. Copper-based or cable solutions similarly are not viable because low population density cannot justify the cost of infrastructure, or because existing technology simply cannot reach all areas. Without wireless broadband Internet service that ITFS can provide, high speed broadband Internet access may not be available at all" (p.12).

    2. Trade wireless space for fiber bandwidth. This looks good on the surface but since fiber carries so much more capacity than wireless space, a simple trade based on data carrying capacity might not derive the best value for education.

    3. Auction the bandwidth to the highest bidder if one can get from the FCC new spectrum allocation space for existing programs. After all, this is exactly what the FCC will do with the bandwidth if they take it back and the money will go to the Federal government, not schools.

    4. Rent/lease the space to corporations, then use it buy whatever is needed for the next 100 years, including fiber bandwidth. However, there is no guarantee that in spite of the intense speculation that real wealth will follow.

    There have been ongoing stories in the press about this for months. For example, this great coverage in the New York Times:


    Questions

    1. Higher education was not listed as involved in this filing even though this spectrum has been used by higher education also. Either way, colleges of education have a very direct stake in the outcome of this debate. Is there an opportunity and a need for Deans of teacher education programs to take a position?

    2. Is there a national higher education organization that can become involved? Teacher education programs as a part of university systems have been well supported in infrastructure for cyberspace. We know that K-12 schools are in a tough fight for bandwidth.

    3. All this raises further questions about the university system's and the state's educational position in this debate. Can governor's offices seeking to get more bandwidth for their public schools become involved? Does the UNC system have such spectrum? Does WCU have rights to such spectrum in our area? What school districts have rights to ITFS? Who is the state ITFS expert that has the facts on what we have in place?

    4. Could ITFS spectrum converted to broadband Internet use in Western North Carolina allow Representative Taylor and our regional Educational Research Commission to bypass our current impasse with telephone companies who are not convinced that it is time to open up the regional fiber that they own? Perhaps the very possibility of a network that would take the educational system out of some future date in using telephone fiber would increase their interest in opening up.  If they choose not to open up, the funding already secured by Taylor's office could be put to more immediate use in developing such a network since lines do not have to be put into the ground. Regional schools could more rapidly gain access to the bandwidth we so sorely need.

    5. If Western North Carolina does not begin some kind of planning to use or more widely use ITFS immediately is it possible that our spectrum could be lost while other regions of the country that are using it might retain it?

    Other Resources

    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/reports/bba97.html
    This reports on the Feb. 1998 effort to identify military spectrum that could be used.

    Several other NTIA/OSM spectrum engineering reports are also available.
    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/reports.html

    There is a Federal Office of Spectrum Management
    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/osmhome.html

    Synthetic Biology

    (New topic as of Nov 24, '05)
     

    Is synthetic biology's potential  to help mankind great enough for it to legally proceed in spite of the risk of accidents and intentional misuse for weapons? What criteria should be used to determine if this is "the best thing to do"?

    Synthetic biology is the artificial creation of DNA, genes and cells through moving features from one living system to another that does not have a particular feature or simply changing a system's DNA so that the new creation can carry out functions that it does not do naturally or do better than it would naturally. The emerging field involves specialized skills in biology, chemistry and engineering. Numerous laboratories around the world use synthetic biology knowledge to produce biological computers, vaccines, synthetic drugs, pollution sensors and more. This area of science became a social issue as experts began to warn that such artificial life forms could be accidentally or intentionally turned loose in the environment with the potential for deadly consequences.


      Web Page Address: http://www.ceap.wcu.edu/Houghton/EDELCompEduc/Issues/issues.html

      If you have questions or suggestions about this file, contact me at the author address below.


      Return to the top of this page.


      [Pageauthor Houghton]

      Dr. Robert S. Houghton, Copyright, 1994-. Updated November 24, 2005